Last fall Mr. Marsh, the publisher of my argument on Slavery, sent me a copy of a letter he had received from you. In it you say, "I had intended to take an active part in supplying the lawyers of this state with it (my argument). But recent occurrences have disinclined me to carry out this intention." , , The "recent occurrences" here alluded to, are the fact that I did not choose to work for you, and enlighten your ignorance, without pay. , , In January Bradburn wrote me a letter, and in it he gave an extract from one he had just received from you. In this extract, in speaking of your discussion at Syracuse, you say, "Of course, I availed myself greatly of Lysander Spooner's argument." , , It seems, therefore, that while you avow your disinclination - and act upon the disinclination - to give my arguments to the bar, in my own words, it is yet a matter "of course" with you to use them as materials for a speech, whenever you attempt one of your public displays.